ISLAMABAD, April 12, 2026 — High-level negotiations between the United States and Iran ended without a deal in Pakistan’s capital, highlighting deep divisions over Tehran’s nuclear programme and regional security issues.
US Vice President JD Vance departed Islamabad after nearly 21 hours of intensive talks, confirming that Washington had presented what he described as a “final and best offer.” However, he said Iran declined to accept the proposal, leaving the negotiations at a standstill.
“We came in good faith and made our position very clear,” Vance told reporters. “Unfortunately, we were unable to reach an agreement.” He stressed that the United States is seeking a long-term, verifiable commitment from Iran that it will not pursue nuclear weapons or maintain the capability to develop them rapidly.
Iranian officials, however, offered a more measured response. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said the talks were constructive in parts, with both sides reaching some level of understanding on certain issues. Still, he acknowledged that key disagreements remain unresolved, particularly given the atmosphere of mistrust following recent conflict.
Nuclear Dispute at the Core
The primary sticking point in the Islamabad talks was Iran’s nuclear programme. The US has insisted on firm guarantees that go beyond temporary restrictions, aiming for a permanent commitment from Tehran.
Iran, on the other hand, has reiterated its right to peaceful nuclear development and rejected what it calls “excessive demands” from Washington. Iranian representatives argue that any agreement must respect their sovereignty and legal rights under international frameworks.
Strait of Hormuz Remains Contentious
Another major issue was control over the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil shipments. The United States has demanded assurances that the waterway will remain open and secure, while Iran views it as a strategic asset and bargaining tool.
Analysts say these two issues — nuclear commitments and maritime control — have created a wide gap between the negotiating positions of the two countries.
Pakistan’s Mediation Praised
Despite the lack of a breakthrough, Pakistan’s role as host and mediator was widely appreciated. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was credited with facilitating direct, face-to-face talks between the longtime adversaries — a rare diplomatic achievement.
Officials in Islamabad indicated that communication channels remain open and that further rounds of talks could still take place.
Regional Tensions Complicate Efforts
Ongoing regional conflicts have also cast a shadow over the negotiations. Israeli military operations in Lebanon, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have intensified tensions and complicated diplomatic efforts.
At the same time, mixed signals from US President Donald Trump — particularly regarding the importance of the Strait of Hormuz — have added uncertainty to Washington’s broader strategy.
No Deal, But Dialogue Continues
Although the Islamabad summit ended without a formal agreement, both sides have avoided declaring a complete breakdown. The US maintains that its proposal remains open, while Iran has indicated it is not under pressure to rush into a deal.
At the same time, mixed signals from US President Donald Trump — particularly regarding the importance of the Strait of Hormuz — have added uncertainty to Washington’s broader strategy.
👉 Get Details
https://thereporter24.com/news/vance-departs-pakistan-as-islamabad-summit-ends-in-deadlock-washington-issues-final-offer-tehran-pushes-back
No comments: